
r96sk
Lame horror. <em>'Poltergeist'</em> offers nothing. It may not be an absolutely awful watch, but there's nothing about this that's good unfortunately. The story is largely predictable and plain, none of the cast give anything close to a ...


Movie spotlight
A family's suburban home is invaded by angry spirits. When the terrifying apparitions escalate their attacks and take the youngest daughter, the family must come together to rescue her.
A suburban family's idyllic life is shattered when malevolent spirits invade their home, targeting their youngest daughter. They must band together to rescue her from the spectral realm with the help of paranormal investigators. The film explores themes of modern technology's influence on hauntings and parental desperation.
The 2015 remake of Poltergeist received generally unfavorable reviews from critics. While some acknowledged its attempt to update the classic story for a new generation and praised certain performances, many found it to be a lackluster imitation of the original. Audiences were similarly divided, with many feeling it failed to capture the magic and scares of the 1982 film.
A visually competent remake that lacks the scares and emotional depth of the original.
Fails to offer anything new or compelling beyond its updated special effects.
Performances are a highlight, but they can't save the derivative plot.
Google audience: Google users had mixed reactions, with many finding the film to be a decent horror flick but a disappointing remake. Some appreciated the modern take and the performances, while others felt it was overly reliant on jump scares and lacked the chilling atmosphere of the original.
Director Gil Kenan stated that the intention behind the remake was not to replicate the original, but to create a new story that honored its spirit while exploring modern themes and fears.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources
No critic reviews have been posted yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Lame horror. <em>'Poltergeist'</em> offers nothing. It may not be an absolutely awful watch, but there's nothing about this that's good unfortunately. The story is largely predictable and plain, none of the cast give anything close to a ...
The movie blurb is written by some 20th Century Fox representative. I would guess that the person in question has not even watched the original movie. “Legendary film makers”? What a load of bull! These people have not produced anything rea...
I had huge reservations about watching this remake, which I felt was completely unnecessary. It wasn't as bad as I had anticipated, and that the bad reviews at the time gave me the impression I should fear or avoid watching it. The special ...

> Would have been a better film if it was an original. Unnecessary to compare this with the original and I tried, but impossible to avoid it since it's an official remake. Everything, from the house to frame by frame, all the scenes look...
It’s not the worst remake of all time, but it’s just ordinary. It’s bland, lifeless, vanilla, and feels like what the Lifetime Channel in America would do to a remake of the Tobe Spielberg classic haunting film. I think the only reason Gil ...
No video reviews found for this title yet.